We don't support console modding here.

If it's not in the description or the comments then you'd have to download the mod and view the files to see what vehicle it replaces. If the mod is an OIV file then just open it with an archive manager and search for the vehicle files to find out what it replaces (OIV files are just ZIP files renamed).

You can always rename the vehicle's files so that it replaces another vehicle (although you'll also have to edit any configuration files such as handling data to match the new vehicle name).

Buy it on Steam or Rockstar Warehouse. If you're referring to pirated versions of the game, we can't help you with that.

@Candice_211
Okay, thanks for the info. I know you can't delete another user's comments.

The problem with the supposed spam of low ratings is not something we can help with. We have no evidence of them grouping together, but it's not like grouping together to rate mods is against the rules (if it was, you'd be breaking them too). All of their ratings follow the rules, so they can stay, even if their ratings aren't entirely fair due to being so low just for being a high-poly model, but I think it's a valid reason to rate low for being too high-poly.
I don't see why a group would resort from accusations of it being a stolen mod to just rating it low (with valid reasoning); what's the point, why would they waste their time, what's the end goal?
This is just my opinion though and other moderators may see it a different way, so maybe the comments will be deleted. It's kind of a gray area, so we'll see. I don't see any ratings about lore though, which would be completely unfair and would be deleted.

If they are being rude on your Discord server then I'd advise to ban them there.

Regarding the secondary account ban, the evidence pointed toward it being an account created by you to rate your own mods. If it's true that it belongs to your SO then I sincerely apologize on behalf of all staff.
Since another account has been created by your SO I suppose the old one will be kept banned, but if necessary we can switch the ban so the new account is banned and old one unbanned, or your SO can request the deletion of one of the accounts. Having multiple accounts is still against the rules.

If you have any problems with unfair ratings or rude comments on the site please report them using the Report link.

@Candice_211 And where are those comments? Were they deleted?

@Candice_211 I'm mainly referring to IGnoTon, who looked into the problems and tried to help out. Most of the other comments ultimately come down to "way too many polygons" but that is not against the rules.

You never gave any back story to the supposed "stolen mod" accusations. I asked a question about it above.

@Candice_211 That does not mean the ratings are not true, or are "trolling" or "hating." Providing constructive criticism is the only requirement for ratings; providing tutorials is not required. There is no reason you should be having such a fit over it. Some of the comments are actually very helpful, and it is not their fault you don't have the tools or knowledge to fix the problems.

@quasar3210 Jump on what bandwagon? A moderator saw a secondary account (indicated by the account having the exact same IP address, having just been created, and the only activity being of rating two of Candice's mods), banned it, and told Candice not to make multiple accounts. There is no indication of not "staying neutral", not "investigating complaints thoroughly", or "jumping on the bandwagon."

@Candice_211 Most if not all of the negative comments I saw were in my opinion not "trolling" or "hating" as you have said multiple times, but were actually pointing out problems or bad quality and rating according to that. IGnoTon was especially very detailed and helpful in his comment. Rating low is not against the rules here, as long as the comment contains constructive criticism, which the ones I've seen did.
I don't see any comments about it being a stolen mod. Perhaps you're talking about a different mod, or were the comments deleted?

Now another account has been created that said the secondary account was your SO's, which if is true we are sorry about that, the evidence just pointed towards an account created by you to rate your own mods.